Monday, March 31, 2008

Rhetorical Question Answered

Yes. In sum, this is great news:

  • Moqtada al-Sadr, who will probably play a significant role in the future of Iraq, has not only not lost political power, but has probably gained political capital. (Bad news for Maliki, who has been criticized alternatively for starting the assault or for failing to achieve his guarantee of a conclusive, military victory.)
  • More importantly, it shows that the Iraqis can resolve at least some of their issues diplomatically instead of militarily, which should mean, if not for the incompetence of the Bush administration, that we can start getting the hell out.

Saturday, March 29, 2008

"I'm so worried about what's happened today in the Middle East, you know"

You know how the surge was supposed to foster a reconciliation among the Iraqis? Apparently, that didn't happen.

It's hard to make sense of everything, but this much is certain: Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has launched an offensive against the Mahdi Army, a militia led by Moqtada al-Sadr, and is personally leading the troops in Basra. Both Sadr and Maliki are Shi'ites, but Sadr is popular among the urban poor, nationalistic, and opposed to foreign influence--whether the influence is American or Iranian. Abdul Aziz al-Hakim's Badr Corps, allies of Maliki, are supported by both the U.S. and Iran. The U.S. has provided air cover for Maliki's forces.

From there, things get a little fuzzy: The New York Times paints a picture of limited U.S. and British involvement. The Times also seems to say that the Mahdi Army is upholding its end of a cease-fire agreement and that Iraqi forces are fighting splinter groups who are not controlled by al-Sadr. The Washington Post seems to think that the U.S. will involve itself (or is involved) more deeply in Basra than what the Times portrays. Also, the battle in Basra could last a good while. Meanwhile, Joe Klein's analysis is that American involvement is a bad idea: It will cause more American deaths, it could lead to Sadrist retaliations across Shi'ite Iraq, and it will not solve anything. Also, there's disagreement among officials both in the military and in intelligence about with whom we should have sided in the first place, if at all. Sadr, with his independent streak, could be the best hope for a stable Iraq. And we're launching air strikes at his followers.

Friday, March 28, 2008

MSU SFT



Hey, guys. I'm starting a new chapter of Students for a Free Tibet at Michigan State University and am embedding this good documentary onto the site in case I can't access it from anywhere else. Thanks.

Now, back to the iambic pentameter.

An Inconvenient Smear

CBS is set to air an interview this Sunday with former vice president and presidential candidate Al Gore, touching on those darn naysayers who still refuse to believe global warming (or global climate change, whichever fits your paradigm) is caused by man.
I mean, come on, how can anybody believe it's not, right? But how did we ever get out of any Ice Ages, which we know dominated our planet throughout its history, if man wasn't there to begin the process? How is Mars experiencing global warming? Surely, Sojourner and the other rovers don't release a substantial amount of greenhouse gases! One answer to both questions lies in understanding Milankovitch cycles, which cause planets to wobble in their orbits. This wobbling, in turn, causes variations in temperature (enough to change the course of an ice age). It's a cosmic coincidence that both Mars and Earth are at a point in which Milankovitch cycles have brought both planets out of ice ages.
To be frank, I don't care that Al Gore says this. What really gets my goat is that he compares people who doubt humankind's involvement in whatever is going on to "the ones who still believe that the moon landing was staged in a movie lot in Arizona and those who believe the world is flat...That demeans them a little bit, but it's not that far off." (On a side note, does he include 9/11 or JFK conspiracy theorists in this group?) I personally take offense to that! Why is it acceptable that he may slander and insult me and others who share my viewpoint on the sole basis that we disagree with him? If we are akin to the camp who believes the world is flat (and does anybody really believe that anymore?), I will go so far as to compare the erroneous Nobel Peace Prize-winner to the Church authorities who gagged Galileo when the astronomer so boldly declared the heliocentric theory of the solar system. The motives between the two groups are strikingly similar, when it comes down to it; both entities, specifically Mr. Gore and the myopic Church authorities of their time, are threatened by any dissenting argument. Such debate has the power to remove the pedestal from under their feet, and it appears Mr. Gore has recognized this and has resorted to alarmism.
So where does that leave us? Well, for starters, the founder of the Weather Channel, John Coleman, has said he would like to see Al Gore and other providers of "carbon credits" (or contemporary indulgences, forgiving ecological transgressions) sued for fraud. This is especially crucial after Heidi Cullen, a Weather Channel big-wig, said in 2006 that meteorologists who debate mankind's contributions to global warming ought to stripped of their American Meteorological Association licenses. Have those meteorologists and climatologists become the Galileos of our time?
Only time will tell whether any lawyer has sufficient cojones to take on the task of calling out Mr. Gore.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Little League Cage Fighting

Little Timmy is having some anger issues at school. At recess, he likes to wail on the smaller kids. But, Timmy isn't satisfied to only hammer them with punches. Little Timmy also likes kicks, pressure points, and twists that have bone-breaking potential. What does any responsible parent do with a kid like Timmy? The answer should be obvious.

Thanks to the lovely state of Missouri, there is now a Mixed Martial Arts training group for kids called "Garage Boys Fight Crew."

The 11 boys and one girl on the team range from 6 to 14 years old and are trained by Rudy Lindsey, a youth wrestling coach and a professional mixed martial arts heavyweight.

"The kids learn respect and how to defend themselves. It's no more dangerous than any other sport and probably less so than some," Lindsey said.

Well, until you take an expert's view on the matter. "The trend alarms medical experts and sports officials who worry that young bodies can't withstand the pounding." As Marcus Kabel of the Associated Press reports, "Missouri appears to be the only state in the nation that explicitly allows the youth fights. In many states, it is a misdemeanor for children to participate."

Even Tae Kwon Do, which has the greatest number of kicks than any other martial art and is practiced at all levels of expertise, is more disciplined, safer, and more controlled than a cage fight.


How can one be sure that Little Timmy won't use his cage fighting training to beef up his bullying? Don't worry, says a local police officer. "'It looks violent until you realize this teaches discipline. One of the first rules they learn is that this is not for aggressive behavior outside (the ring),' said Larry Swinehart, a Joplin police officer and father of two boys and the lone girl in the garage group."

Yes, the perfect outlet for Little Timmy's aggression is to send him to the "human cockfighting" class to release his anger on other little children where he has the opportunity to pummel them for two whole minutes wearing minimal protective gear without any interruption from adults. In fact, the adults, instead of giving him yet another detention, cheer him on wildly. As long as Little Timmy learns that cheering equals no jail time, what could possibly go wrong?

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Bill Maher on John McCain

From the "New Rules" section of Real Time with Bill Maher. The McCain segment starts at 2:41:


Sunday, March 23, 2008

4000:

The number of American soldiers who have died fighting in Iraq.

Bill Clinton Should Shut Up

I think it would be a great thing if we had an election year where you had two people who loved this country and were devoted to the interest of this country. And people could actually ask themselves who is right on these issues, instead of all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics.

[Heavy sarcasm] Yes, because Barack Obama does not love this country, nor is he devoted to it. He has a secret Muslim agenda! He has a funny name! [End sarcastic portion of rant.]

Instead of arguing that Barack Obama shouldn't be the Democratic candidate because various commentators can point out, "Look, he wore a turban!" or, "His middle name is Hussein!" maybe you should attack the talking heads who say so...if focusing on the issues is really what's important to you, jerk-face.

(Merrill McPeak, a retired general and Obama advisor, compared Clinton's comments to the deeds of Joseph McCarthy, which is a little over-the-top, but certainly more defensible than what Clinton said.)

For more information.

A Visa from Mogadishu? How Interesting!

Employees of State Department contractors have accessed the passport files of all three presidential candidates without authorization, with Barack Obama's file accessed on three separate occasions by three different people. It is not fully clear whether the employees were merely "imprudent" and "curious," or if something more sinister is going on.

But if something more sinister is going on, it looks like it could hurt...Barack Obama. The lone employee who was not fired for accessing Obama's file worked for Analysis Corporation, whose CEO is John O. Brennan, Obama's foreign policy advisor. (The other two worked for Stanley, Inc. and were both fired.) The Analysis Corp. employee also accessed John McCain's file. Conspiracy theorizing time!

For more information.

Friday, March 21, 2008

Big Waves

The guest on Stephen Colbert's World Water Day episode (episode #04039), Dean Kamen, has an amazing new invention developed by his company, DEKA Research, called a vapor compression distiller that is able to purify any water source into clean, distilled water without using filters, membranes, chemicals, or ion collection with no disposables of any kind. In one day, his machine can produce 1,000 liters of pure distilled water. Kamen also stated that 50% of diseases are caused by water-bourne pathogens.
"So what do you want to do with this [technology]?" Stephen asks.

"Well, since 1.1 billion people, 20% of the world's population, goes to bed every night sick or thirsty because they don't have access to water, clean water, we thought we'd put these in production, figure out how to get them placed around the world, and we'd wipe out 50% of human disease," Dean Kamen replies.

The only trick to placing these machines in areas where clean water is scarce is to make sure that everyone will have equal access to the water and the machines won't end up being controlled by corrupt police and government officials or by gangs.

Regardless, Kamen's vapor compression distiller will definitely be making big waves around the world. Way to go, Dean!

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Thank You, Kofi Annan

Former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan warned Thursday that military action against Iran would be "a real disaster" and said the Middle East could explode if the international community doesn't handle the many conflicts in the region very carefully...

At a wide-ranging round-table with journalists, Annan said he didn't have enough information to comment on the justification for the U.N. Security Council's demand that Iran suspend uranium enrichment until it allays suspicions its nuclear program is trying to produce weapons. Tehran insists the program is peaceful, aimed only at using nuclear power to generate electricity.

Annan said he had told Iranian leaders that "if indeed you have nothing to hide and you are not making a bomb and your intentions are pacific, open your doors, let the inspectors come, let them go anywhere — find a way of reassuring the world, not just the U.S."

Asked how the international community should deal with Iran, he said dialogue was the only way.

"We cannot, I'm sure, take on another military action in Iran, and I hope no one is contemplating it. It would be a real disaster," he said.
Finally, an important international figure speaks out against a foreign policy strategy that only promises to exacerbate conflict within a struggling region of the world. While Annan's comments might be paid more attention and heeded, he is not alone is voicing this truth; many experts share this same view and see the present problems and tensions between Iran and countries such as the United States and Britain as a direct result of grave errors in history for which these Western countries have not made amends.

Annan and other experts' point of view and recommendations for improving relations and resolving tensions have the insight that the current administration so clearly lacks. While both Iran and the United States' leaders have made inflammatory comments about one another's nations and policies but not formally communicated since 1979, dialogue, not military action, is absolutely crucial to improving relationships and healing past wounds. Through peacefully reestablishing alliances with Iran in ways that help the people of Iran, the United States will gain an ally that is key to maintaining stability, promoting real democracy, and solving conflicts throughout the region.

For the full article by the Associated Press on Kofi Annan's comments, click here
.

And so the dialogue begins, right? WRONG!

Well, thank you very much to American media for focusing on the real issues. After Barack Obama's monumental speech on race and how this is the crucial time for a dialogue to begin so that our nation can solve problems that it has ignored, the American news media did us all the favor of playing clips of the speech without having any idea what Obama's message was. It must take a lot of talent to focus on the important issues in a way that completely ignores the important issues.



It's enough to give anyone an aneurysm. So thank you, American news media, for making my head explode.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Another Obama Speech

I'm so glad J-Mad covered Barack Obama's speech on race in America because the one he delivered today about Iraq in Fayetteville, North Carolina, caught my eye. Some excerpts:

If you believe we are fighting the right war, then the problems we face are purely tactical in nature. That is what Senator McCain wants to discuss – tactics. What he and the Administration have failed to present is an overarching strategy: how the war in Iraq enhances our long-term security, or will in the future. That's why this Administration cannot answer the simple question posed by Senator John Warner in hearings last year: Are we safer because of this war? And that is why Senator McCain can argue – as he did last year – that we couldn't leave Iraq because violence was up, and then argue this year that we can't leave Iraq because violence is down.

When you have no overarching strategy, there is no clear definition of success. Success comes to be defined as the ability to maintain a flawed policy indefinitely. Here is the truth: fighting a war without end will not force the Iraqis to take responsibility for their own future. And fighting in a war without end will not make the American people safer...

The central front in the war against terror is not Iraq, and it never was. What more could America's enemies ask for than an endless war where they recruit new followers and try out new tactics on a battlefield so far from their base of operations? That is why my presidency will shift our focus. Rather than fight a war that does not need to be fought, we need to start fighting the battles that need to be won on the central front of the war against al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

If we have actionable intelligence about high-level al-Qaeda targets in Pakistan's border region, we must act if Pakistan will not or cannot. Senator Clinton, Senator McCain, and President Bush have all distorted and derided this position, suggesting that I would invade or bomb Pakistan...It is precisely this kind of political point-scoring that has opened up the security gap in this country. We have a security gap when candidates say they will follow Osama bin Laden to the gates of hell, but refuse to follow him where he actually goes. What we need in our next Commander in Chief is not a stubborn refusal to acknowledge reality or empty rhetoric about 3AM phone calls. What we need is a pragmatic strategy that focuses on fighting our real enemies, rebuilding alliances, and renewing our engagement with the world's people.

Amen.

TIME's Joe Klein reminds us, among other things, that, while presiding over the division and reconstruction of the post-World War I Ottoman Empire, Winston Churchill wrote to Prime Minister David Lloyd George, "We are paying 8 millions a year for the privilege of living on an ungrateful volcano."

The transcript of Obama's speech can be found here.

A More Perfect Union

For anyone undecided about which candidate is best for the United States of America, this speech by Barack Obama ought to make the decision an easy one. This groundbreaking speech is one of the most important in our country's history as it presents the most comprehensive view on race relations in America as well as opens the opportunity for a much-needed dialogue. If there was a single, fundamental reason to support any candidate, it would be to support a candidate who truly understands the United States and is willing to strive to ensure that the nation lives up to the standards it holds for itself, to transcend perceived borders and boundaries between people, in order to make this nation a more perfect union.



For a complete transcript of Barack Obama's speech, click here.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

How Much Do We Really Care About Democracy?

First of all, a shout out to the Florida Sun-Sentinel and the Associated Press for this one.

An article in the Sun-Sentinel last week highlighted a disappointing trend in American politics: nobody votes. As the article points out, residents in an unincorporated community just outside Tamarac, Florida, were faced with an annexation referendum, but apparently nobody there feels any sort of civic duty, and the outcome was 0 for, and 0 against. One voter (out of the 68 registered in the neighborhood) could have decided for all 200 residents whether their community would become part of the city of Tamarac. In all, $2500 were spent in keeping the precinct open for twelve hours, and now the city is considering whether to attempt a mail-in election instead.

Countless American soldiers have fought - and died - in the name of our democratic republic. And if you could, I would tell you to ask any of the old school women suffragists or even the Civil Rights Era leaders - the right to vote is a hard won privilege, and not one to be regarded lightly. It is especially not a right to be disregarded at all.

Beyond the fight for the ballot in the US, though, the fight against autocracy and tyranny has taken a huge toll across the globe, as well. Iraqis line up for hours to stain their fingers with a purple dye, showing they've voted, for instance, and the Great War was even fought to "make the world safe for democracy." Take into consideration the developments in China over the last twenty years, beginning with the student protests in 1989 (although one could easily include movements before then), as well as the recent atrocities in Tibet. It's clear. The allure of a vote is far too tempting for victims of tyranny, and quite rightly so. However, as soon as the vote is won, it becomes old hat. For those Floridians, and for every other citizen of the world's democracies who decides not to participate, I say this: you don't know what you've got 'til it's gone.
And what are the solutions to this problem? The answers are elusive. It's a terrible paradox, then, that enacting legislation or some rule of law that makes voting required is antithetical to democracy. After all, how could a system be free and independent if its most basic and inherent institution were compulsory? Furthermore, if this were the case, the logical outcomes would be two-fold. First of all, the number of uninformed voters would increase exponentially, and secondly, many more votes would simply be bought by the powers that be. But what we have now is the option to vote, not the right, and apparently not the responsibility, to do so.
Perhaps our democratic foundations were flawed, and I hope no one will label me a heretic for saying so. But for anyone who has studied American government in the slightest, it's a well-known (and embarrassingly well-founded) truth that our Founders and Framers had little or no faith in the common citizen's ability to govern him- or herself. Hence, they established a republican government, leaving decisions in the hands of elected representatives. The greatest degree of involvement for the citizenry, for the most part, has thus been reduced to electing representatives, save for the occasional referendum.
But does the republican system perpetuate low voter turnout? Is it because the real decision-making power does not lie with the public that voters feel they can make no difference? I for one feel this is definitely the case when the only choices we have in the way of political candidates are stuffed shirts and talking heads, who happen to be fighting mostly for reelection. Of course, there is also the assumption that one vote cannot make a difference; however, this is clearly not true, as shown by the apathetic residents outside of Tamarac, Florida. However, when the thought that a single vote will not make a difference discourages a substantial portion of the voters, the fewer resulting votes are worth far more individually.
Whatever the cause for our apathy, shame on us. Who are we to fight a war in foreign lands, espousing democracy, when we apparently feel no affinity for it at home?

Monday, March 17, 2008

Meet Governor Paterson

David A. Paterson was sworn in as the governor of New York today, following the sex scandal that forced Eliot Spitzer's resignation. Paterson is the country's second blind governor. (Bob Riley served as an interim governor of Arkansas in 1975.) Also, he is only the nation's fourth African-American governor.

Unlike his more confrontational predecessor, Paterson called for bipartisan unity:

Let us grab the unusual opportunities that circumstance has handed us today and put personal politics, party advantage and power struggles aside, in favor of service, in the interests of the people...

No matter how talented an individual may be, no matter how much energy he might posses, regardless of how much integrity and honesty he or she may have, if that person is alone, they can accomplish very little...

And so what we are going to do from now on is what we always should have done: we are going to work together. With conviction in our brains and compassion in our hearts and the love for New York on our sleeves, we will dedicate ourselves to principle but always maintain the ability to listen. And now we look forward in this great state, we look forward with our eyes very much on the greatness of New York, and we look forward – ever forward – together.

It will be interesting to see what role he'll play in the election. In virtue of his being a Democratic governor, Paterson is also a superdelegate. Spitzer had supported Hillary, but Paterson's style seems to put him in the Obama camp. Will he go for Obama, or follow the Democrats of New York and support Clinton instead?

For more information.

Saturday, March 15, 2008

"War is Peace"

Leave it to the Chinese government to restrict protests, then twist events, and intensify martial law, while simultaneously denying their crimes. This time, the Chinese government has turned a week of the most intense protesting seen in Tibet and the rest of the world in decades into yet another myth. As Jim Yardley of The New York Times reports,
BEIJING — Thousands of Buddhist monks and other Tibetans clashed with the riot police in a second Chinese city on Saturday, while the authorities said they had regained control of the Tibetan capital, Lhasa, a day after a rampaging mob ransacked shops and set fire to cars and storefronts in a deadly riot.

Residents in Lhasa, the Tibetan capital, walked through Barkhor, an ancient part of the city where protesters had set fire to a shop and several vehicles on Friday. Conflicting reports emerged about the violence in Lhasa on Friday. The Chinese authorities denied that they had fired on protesters there, but Tibetan leaders in India told news agencies on Saturday that they had confirmed that 30 Tibetans had died and that they had unconfirmed reports that put the number at more than 100.
Chinese authorities defended their response to the violence in Lhasa. “We fired no gunshots,” said Qiangba Puncog, chairman of the Tibet Autonomous Regional Government, according to state media.

But Tibetan advocacy groups and witnesses in Lhasa offered contradictory accounts. The Tibetan government in exile said at least 30 Tibetans died in the protests, according to Agence France-Presse. Witnesses told Radio Free Asia, the nonprofit news agency financed by the United States government, that numerous Tibetans were dead. A 13-year-old Tibetan boy, reached by telephone, said he watched the violence from his apartment and saw four or five Tibetans fall to the ground after military police officers fired upon them.
The protests also disprove yet another lie propagated by Chinese authorities.
The tumult also undercuts a theme regularly promoted by China’s propaganda officials — that Tibetans are a happy minority group, smoothly integrated into the country’s broader ethnic fabric.
It is sad that such a peaceful people simply desiring freedom and democracy are only noticed as endangered by a repressive government when they are provoked to lashing out in violence against an oppressor infinitely larger than themselves. As Wolf Blitzer reports,


Clearly, people across the world are calling for action to prevent the genocide China has engaged in since 1949 that has been largely ignored by the international community. The plight of the Tibetan people is one that is rooted in the minds of all people, regardless of their origin. As a promoter of democracy and a nation vowed to uphold the Geneva Conventions, the United States is in a key position of influence to encourage and persuade the Chinese government to stop its murderous campaigns and allow Tibet to uphold its culture and the democracy they desire through meaningful autonomy.

Or, better yet, independence.

For the rest of the story, click here.

For more by Jim Yardley, click here.


Friday, March 14, 2008

Unacceptable

The Pentagon's inspector general released a report three days ago faulting KBR, a former Halliburton subsidiary, for providing our soldiers unclean water. The water was only used for washing and shaving, but still may have been responsible for "38 reported illnesses that 'an attending medical official said could be attributed to water, such as skin abscesses, cellulitis, skin infections and diarrhea.'"

Instead of expressing anger, disappointment, or anything remotely sensible, Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell defended KBR, saying that no definitive connection had been found linking KBR's water and the soldiers' medical problems, and that servicemen "are constantly reminded only to drink bottled water"...Even though they weren't drinking it, merely showering in it.

For more.

Oversight, Schmo-versight

From Charlie Savage of the Boston Globe:

Almost 32 years to the day after President Ford created an independent Intelligence Oversight Board made up of private citizens with top-level clearances to ferret out illegal spying activities, President Bush issued an executive order that stripped the board of much of its authority.

The White House did not say why it was necessary to change the rules governing the board when it issued Bush's order late last month. But critics say Bush's order is consistent with a pattern of steps by the administration that have systematically scaled back Watergate-era intelligence reforms.

"It's quite clear that the Bush administration officials who were around in the 1970s are settling old scores now," said Tim Sparapani, senior legislative counsel to the American Civil Liberties Union.

For more.

And Now For Something Completely Different

It may be a little absurd, but an obvious Obama supporter has created three websites about the candidates: Barack Obama is a nice guy, Hillary Clinton is rude, and John McCain is old.

My favorite? "Hillary Clinton wants you to know the Italians plagiarized pasta from the Chinese."

A Judge and a Lucky Bastard

CNN International reported today that India's top court is indefinitely suspending an arrest warrant against American actor and humanitarian Richard Gere for offending cultural sensibilities by kissing Indian Bollywood star Shilpa Shetty at an AIDS Awareness event in April 2007.



In the immortal wisdom of Jon Stewart, that would offend "cultural sensibilities" in the United States, too.

Next time, act less like an American and learn a little something about the people of a country you've been visiting for over 30 years. It's easy. Just ask for a transfer off Ethnocentric Express and take the B-Train to Relativism because the Lucky Bastard line isn't always in operation.

Here We Go Again

Is it possible? The Michigan Legislature is actually getting something done?
The state is planning on a June 3 do-over primary for the Democratic presidential candidates, funded privately. Hopefully nothing falls through, and they won't settle on a mail-in primary like in Florida. Here's to making our votes count...

http://www.mlive.com/elections/index.ssf/2008/03/michigan_democrats_target_june.html

FREE TIBET! STOP GENOCIDE!

Monday, March 10th, 2008, marked the 49th anniversary of the failed 1959 Tibetan uprising against Chinese invasion, oppression, and genocide. While demonstration of any kind against the People's Republic of China (PRC) in the Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR) is illegal and punishable by imprisonment, torture, and death, every year, both in the TAR and around the world (Thank You, Nepal), people bravely speak out against China's crimes. This year, the protests broke into riot in Lhasa, resulting in gunfire and intensification of the already harsh martial law.

This year however, with the upcoming Beijing 2008
Olympics, China has been under pressure to account for its human rights violations domestically as well as its involvement in support of the Khartoum government in Sudan. The Chinese government has tried to present China as a unified nation and has ignored its gross human rights abuses. On October 17, 2007, His Holiness XIV Dalai Lama was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal, the United States' highest civilian honor, by President Bush (probably the only good thing the President has and will ever do in his lifetime and although the two have met in private several times, this is the first time Bush has agreed to publicly do so). The Chinese government "called the ceremony an affront to the budding relations between the countries." While the Chinese government has attempted to paint His Holiness as a separatist, His Holiness strongly advocates for more democracy and meaningful autonomy in Tibet. The Chinese government has claimed that Tibet has always been a part of China even though all historical evidence proves otherwise.
In addition to the human rights and Geneva Convention violations that the Chinese government commits against the Tibetan people, China has implemented plans for complete ethnic/cultural genocide of the Tibetan people since China's unlawful invasion led by Mao Zedong in 1949. Some of the largest projects today that will result in this are the Quinghai-Tibet Railroad, already under construction, and the Quinghai Airport, both expected to bring in even larger numbers of Chinese into Tibet (where they currently outnumber Tibetans) and further eradicate Tibetan culture. The Chinese government states that the railroad's first run is good because "not only national pride is on the rise, but also infrastructure convenience for Sino-South Asian trade boom is largely improved" while admitting through its ambassadors that the TAR is the poorest region in China by far and contributes the least to China's economy. The Quinghai-Tibet Railroad will extend from Lhasa, the capital of the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR), to Xigaze, near the boarders of India, Bhutan, and Nepal. The new line is expected to open in 2010 and carry seven million tons of cargo per year and eventually increase that amount to ten million tons at speeds of at least 120 km/h.

The opening of a new extension to this railroad, especially near these specific boarders, is crucial to the survival of the Tibetan people. Because of the legal system in the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Tibetans attempting to flee the TAR (most heading to Dharamsala, India) can be arrested and imprisoned. If escaping Tibetans get out of the TAR and PRC and into Nepal, they can still be arrested until they can make it to Katmandu, Nepal’s capital, and obtain official refugee status. Without those papers, they can be arrested by Nepalese officials; under King Gyanendra’s rule, Nepal and the PRC were allies so Tibetans arrested by Nepalese police were routinely handed over to PRC officials (1). However, with Maoist rebels in Nepal becoming integrated in a new political system in Nepal after a ten year war, it appears as though the PRC is unsure of what the outcome will be and if it will be able to maintain that relationship with Nepal. On February 12, 2007, a report was released by the International Campaign for Tibet documenting the passage from the TAR into exile (2). In 2006, the issue received international attention when a 25 year old Tibetan nun and other unarmed civilians were shot attempting to make a pilgrimage to HH XIV Dalai Lama. With a new railway opening near the boarders of the countries that Tibetans flee into, the PRC will be able to arrest far more Tibetans without the help of Nepalese authorities.

This situation of the railroads is reminiscent of the American railroads into the Great Plains. The expansion of rail lines into the western part of the United States led to a tremendous influx of American settlers and led to the destruction of the American Indians and their cultures. There is much evidence to suggest that the same scenario is occurring presently within the TAR. When the Qinghai-Tibet railroad first began construction, it was expected to be a major transportation route for trade and tourists, thus making Tibetans minorities in their homeland and contributing to further destruction of their culture (3). The Qinghai-Tibet Railroad was simply another way for the PRC to try to destroy a group of people and a second line opening without substantial protest from the rest of the world will have horrible repercussions for the Tibetan people and the world will witness the preventable elimination of a unique group of people and their culture.

With the Beijing 2008 Olympics around the corner, the opportunity to confront China about its genocidal policies, both domestically in Tibet and abroad in Darfur, is clear and necessary to show the commitment a country makes when signing the Geneva Conventions and joining the United Nations. As an economic tiger that may soon overtake the United States as the leading global superpower, an unwavering commitment to human rights and democracy is needed now more than ever before. While the United Nations can enforce binding economic sanctions or follow Spain's brave example of prosecuting Chinese leaders for war crimes, the international community can no longer continue to ignore the worst genocide of modern times.


(1) Sarkar, Sudeshna. Telugu Portal, 2/9/07, “Richard Gere to Launch Report on Tibetan Exodus from China.”

(2) International Campaign for Tibet, 2/8/07, “New Report Documents Dangerous Flight into Exile for Tibetans.”

(3) Yardley, Jim. New York Times, September 15, 2003, “Trying to Reshape Tibet, China Sends in the Masses”

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

WHORES!



As you may have heard about through the similarly dignified way the United States media reports on the significance of yet another governmental sex scandal, New York governor Eliot Spitzer is linked by payments totaling a few thousand dollars from various bank accounts to an expensive call-girl service. As Michael Lando of international.jpost.com writes, in one instance:

Spitzer allegedly paid for a call girl to take a train from New York to Washington - a move that opened the transaction up to federal prosecution because she crossed state lines. The governor has not been charged, and prosecutors would not comment on the case. A Spitzer spokesman said the governor had retained a large Manhattan law firm.

The case started when banks noticed the frequent transfers from several accounts and filed suspicious activity reports with the Internal Revenue Service, the law enforcement official told the AP. The accounts were traced back to Spitzer, prompting public corruption investigators to open an inquiry.

It's comical to think that had Spitzer been the governor of Nevada and spent time in Elko or Las Vegas (and of course, not been married), his frequenting of expensive call-girl services would have been legal. Gov. Spitzer is now facing intense pressure to resign due to the national attention this scandal has received. If Spitzer had not crossed state lines, staying within New York, there would not have been a federal investigation nor the media attention that will most likely result in his resignation. This would be the time for the Democratic party to take a page out of the Republican playbook as to how to keep explosive, heterosexual sex scandals from surfacing.

On the bright side, Spitzer's resignation might mean one less super-delegate for Hillary Clinton.

Monday, March 10, 2008

Whoops

Apparently Hillary Clinton's infamous 3 AM ad used some old stock footage. One of the girls in it, Casey Knowles, is turning 18 and voting for Barack Obama.

Thursday, March 6, 2008

War and Politics

Daily Kos' Michael Clark sure draws interesting analogies. Mostly citing his support for the surge in Iraq and his deference towards President Bush at a recent press conference, John McCain is apparently Hubert Humphrey to Bush's LBJ and will thus experience the same sort of political failure in '08 that Humphrey did in '68.

Meanwhile, New York Times' Stanley Fish makes an equally interesting but opposite argument--McCain's positioning on Iraq would help him win a general against Barack Obama:

On the one hand, [McCain] voted to authorize the invasion. On the other, he consistently disagreed with the administration’s prosecution of the war in general and with the judgment of defense Secretary Rumsfeld in particular. And on the third hand, he advocated for a course of action that was at last implemented in the so-called “surge,” and with some success.

So, at any moment, he would be able to present himself as a strong patriot, and at another moment as a critic of the hard-line hawks, and at still another as a hard-line hawk with more experience and military knowledge than the others...

[Obama's stance is] inflexible and without nuance. McCain can ask, 'Don’t you see that the situation has changed in recent months, and shouldn't a responsible leader adjust his or her stance according to the facts on the ground?' And he can add, 'I too had my doubts about the conduct of the war, but now a policy I long advocated has been put in place with good results.'

I think neither Clark nor Fish are completely right. I think Iraq will definitely be a liability for McCain. Sure, he could argue that the surge has helped reduce violence in Iraq, but the main purpose of the surge was political reconciliation. The greatest achievement the Iraqi Parliament has to show for itself is adopting a new flag...that the Sunnis refuse to fly. Obama would argue that the only thing that would allow reconciliation in Iraq is the realization that American troops will not be there forever, despite McCain's rhetoric of a 10,000-year occupation.

I also believe McCain would try to paint himself as "patriot/critic/hawk," and not be yoked by Bush. But Fish overlooks one thing: I was alive in 2004; does he really expect me to believe that the American electorate would choose the flip-flopper over the resolute?