Locally, the fight over the mosque has been more than ugly. Its founders—a well-known interfaith activist and spiritual leader named Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf; his wife, Daisy Khan; and a downtown Manhattan real-estate developer named Sharif El-Gamal—originally called their project Cordoba House, after the medieval town in Spain where a Muslim caliphate fostered one of the most vibrant periods of interfaith flourishing in history. But critics seized on the name as a signal that Rauf and the others had Islamic hegemony in mind, and the founders changed the name to the generic Park51 (based on the site’s street address)...However, responses to the project have been severe. Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert weigh in on some of these reactions below:Park51 was born several years ago, the vision of Rauf, Khan, and El-Gamal. In 1997 Rauf and Khan founded the American Society for Muslim Advancement, an organization devoted to interfaith work and promoting the cause of moderate Islam. In addition, Rauf had been the imam, or pastor, of a mosque in Tribeca, just 10 blocks north of the new, controversial site, for nearly 30 years. El-Gamal had his office nearby and prayed there frequently. The mosque, which still exists today, is a tiny storefront wedged between a bar and a French bistro. On Friday afternoons—which for Muslims is like Sunday morning—congregants overflow onto the sidewalk.
The site is huge, nearly 100,000 square feet. Standing in front of the building, you cannot see Ground Zero; tall buildings entirely block the view. Khan says they chose it because it was big enough and it had the right zoning. Moreover, it was symbolically advantageous. “We want to provide a counter momentum against extremism,” says Khan, who spoke to me in her office. (Her husband was out of town.) “We want peace, and we want it where it matters most. This is where it matters most.”Frustrated by the cramped quarters, El-Gamal, an American born to a Polish mother and an Egyptian father, was inspired to improve facilities for Muslims downtown—and, after 9/11, to show his friends and neighbors “a new face of Islam, the voice that is not heard.” He bought the building at 45–51 Park Place two years ago for $5 million, and together with Khan and Feisal sketched out a plan. They would demolish the existing building and put in its place a deluxe, multipurpose center big enough to house a swimming pool, a gym, exhibition space, conference rooms, day care, a senior center, and a 500-seat auditorium. It would accommodate all the downtown workers—lawyers and laborers—who wanted to pray on Fridays; it would have an interfaith board and interfaith programming; and it would present to the world a moderate, peace-loving, diverse, ordinary Islam. As of last week, El-Gamal says, they had gotten all the necessary city approvals to begin construction on Park51, though lawsuits are still pending. The budget for the proposed construction is $100 million, which Khan says they hope to raise mostly through a bond offering.
The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, 16 August 2010:
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Mosque-Erade | ||||
| ||||
The Colbert Report, 16 August 2010:
| The Colbert Report | Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| Growing Intelligence Community - Richard Clarke | ||||
| ||||
Finally, President Barack Obama stepped up and directly addressed the issue, stating his emphatic support of religious freedom and tolerance for all beliefs.
To borrow a phrase from Stephen Colbert, Obama nailed it. If there is anything that the United States should have learned in the past decade, it is that straying from the fundamental principles outlined in the Bill of Rights and the subsequent abuse of these principles has caused more harm than good to American interests. If the United States really wants to improve relations in the Muslim world, demonstrating tolerance of Islam and all religious beliefs has to start at home. Furthermore, the problems in any faith lie at the extremes. It would behoove the American public to recognize this and work to support and encourage moderates who are interested in interfaith work in order to diminish the influence that these extremists can have on a population.
Tolerating this (and other) Islamic Center(s) is not something "extra" that Americans have to do - it is part of what comes with living in a country that draws strength from its diversity, even if the American people need occasional reminders of this. In the words of the late American author Kurt Vonnegut Jr., "The purpose of human life, no matter who is controlling it, is to love whoever is around to be loved," (Sirens of Titan).
2 comments:
Most people who are not Muslims want the following done, FIRST, before any mosque is built anywhere near Ground Zero (hint - the reason you cannot "see Ground Zero from where the mosque is to be built" is that....all the bldgs hit by airplanes flown by RADICAL, ISLAMIC, INTOLERANT-of-any-view outside-their-own-b#st@rds who are now cooking in hellfire caused damage that LEVELED the said bldgs...to the GROUND, as in in ZERO level):
1) This imam must publicly do an about-face of all things he has said in the past that lend even the slightest idea or implication that the US is to "blame" or responsible for any radical, Islamic terrorism perpetrated by stateless, moronic 7th century dwelling barbarians who have hijacked a religion...we ARE NOT to blame for Osama Bin Laden or any of his unholy, Hell-bound murderers...period. Anything short is this is a SHOW STOPPER!
2) Retract in full, publicly, his statement that the US should become "Sharia" (sp?) compliant - what an idiotic fool this chump of a "pastor" (NOT!) is - where does he get off telling people who view ONLY one Friday per year as Holy how to live? We will view Saturdays & Sundaya as our Holy Days, thank you very much. Next...
3) FULLY disclose all & complete traces of funding, including the audit trails of money coming from overseas, "Euro" originated accounts....obvious and 'nuff said on this point.
Then and only then can we discuss the mosque being built on that spot....which means, in essence, is will never be built, because the imam would sign his own death warrant by saying the above points and committing what would be seen apostasy by the out-of-control wing of Islam.
First, according to his wife, Rauf's comment was referring to American support of the mujahadin during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
Second, I'm not sure what you're referring to, but it does not seem like Rauf thinks that Sharia and American law are incompatible. Quote: "And to a large extent, Muslims are very enamored of [Western] systems, and would like to implement them in their own societies ... because these principles and norms are completely in sync with the principles of the Quran and the teachings of the prophet."
Does this satisfy your demands? And would you be making them if an extremist pastor was trying to build a Christian church? Perhaps you would; you do acknowledge that there is a difference between terrorists and mainstream Muslims, so maybe you have a problem with extremists of all stripes. If so, I applaud you. But if not, should we really curtail someone's freedoms of religion and speech just because a large group of people, even if it's a majority, is intolerant?
Post a Comment